Leadership is such a critical aspect of team success that without it they will ultimately fail. Companies spend millions a year selecting, grooming and developing leaders. Organizations that seek to transform their operations should keep an eye out for transformational leadership that can adjust and change to new environments. Whether one is seeking a business executive or the next military officer understanding emergent transformational leadership as it works in live situations is beneficial for recruitment.
Groups, regardless of type, will eventually form a command structure. It is one of the most natural occurrences in both civilized and uncivilized society. The kind of leadership, poor or high, will determine the values of the group and how well it performs under pressure. Whether discussing business or the military, ensuring the right type of leaders makes their way forward helps in developing high functioning teams.
Research into military teams highlights how transformational grassroots military leadership emerges from within the ranks when times are tough. Traits of emergent transformational leadership includes: visionary, leads by example, empowering others, sincerity of purpose, moral value system, genuine car for others, compassion, self-sacrificing, and self-efficacy (Bangari & Singh, 2014).
The confident but compassionate leader runs contrary to cultural fallacies that believe effective leadership is a domination game only. Transformational leaders create followers where power oriented leaders rely too heavily on formal position or fear that limits loyalty. Having the “golden touch” with others will still being driven toward goals seems to make a significant difference in outcomes.
Selecting and fostering leadership in business and military occupations is important because they can inspire followers to raise their performance to accomplish objectives above and beyond themselves. Ensuring that the people with the right characteristics are brought forward and develop a sense of responsibility for others helps in solidifying social bonds and promotes loyalty.
Bangari, R. & Sngh, V. (2014). Establishing a framework of transformational grassroots military leadership: lessons from high-intensity, high-risk operational environments. The Journal for Decision Makers, 39 (3).
The blog discusses current affairs and development of national economic and social health through unique idea generation. Consider the blog a type of thought experiment where ideas are generated to be pondered but should never be considered definitive as a final conclusion. It is just a pathway to understanding and one may equally reject as accept ideas as theoretical dribble. New perspectives, new opportunities, for a new generation. “The price of freedom is eternal vigilance.”—Thomas Jefferson
Showing posts with label transformational leadership. Show all posts
Showing posts with label transformational leadership. Show all posts
Tuesday, June 16, 2015
Monday, August 19, 2013
Positive Workplace Interactions Foster Transformational Leadership Skills
Developing
transformational leadership is beneficial for the creation of higher levels of
organizational performance. Such leaders help raise the standards within their
workplace and inspire their followers toward a brighter vision. According to a study by Trepanier, et. al leadership
is an exercise of self-perception base in part on the relationships fostered
within the workplace (2012). When intrinsic motivation meets a receptive
environment a higher level of performance can be achieved.
Transformational
leadership is a style that encourages higher levels of organizational
development. It is characterized by charisma, motivation, intellectual
stimulation, and individual consideration (Bass, 1985). Such leaders are capable of using intrinsic
values to achieve goals and feel as though they can engage socially with
others. It is a process of self-realization for the development of higher
levels of organizational performance.
Leadership does not
develop in a vacuum and is social rooted by nature. Based deeply on trust,
respect, positive relationships, mutual support the leader can flourish in his
or her endeavors (Graen & Uhl-Bien, 1995). They rely on these pro-social behaviors and
their perceptions of their environment to flourish in their skills. Such
leaders are born from the people who will follow them.
Like other workers,
leadership comes with either internal or external motivation. The essential
difference is that those who have internal motivations are more likely to
develop a transformational style based in trust, task enjoyment and self-worth
(Barbuto,
2005). Externally motivated people may simply not have the ability to follow an
internal compass to step outside of the box to change their environment.
The researchers
Trepanier, et. al (2012) studied 568 principles to test a model of how
perceptions of quality relationships within the workplace predict the
perceptions of transformation leadership behavior through the development of
intrinsic motivation and self-efficacy. The self-reported surveys highlighted a
number of interesting findings.
The results revealed
that managers who believed they participated in meaningful relationships at
work viewed themselves as leaders who can inspire and encourage others to have
a sense of mission. Likewise, those who felt efficient in their skills also
believed that they display actions that promote the best interests of an
organization and its members. Finally, their findings also indicate that by
fostering positive work relationships between managers and their work units
would help foster perceptions of transformational leadership.
The study helps
decision makers understand that leadership is a process of growth in
self-perception. When positive and civil relationships are fostered intrinsically,
motivated people can rise to a leadership level. Each workplace is a
socio-economic entity of bounded rationality and seeks to compete on the
marketplace. Encouraging positive interactions, helps foster the development of
new skills and higher levels of performance.
Barbuto, J. (2005). Motivation and
transactional, charismatic, and trans-formational leadership: A test of
antecedents. Journal of Leadership and Organizational
Studies, 11.
Bass, B. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations.New York, NY:
Free Press
Graen, G.& Uhl-Bien, M. (1995).
Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member
exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level
multi-domain perspec-
tive. Leadership Quarterly, 6.
Trepanier, et. al
(2012). Social and motivational antecedents of perceptions of transformational
leadership: a self-determination theory perspective. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 44 (4).
Wednesday, August 14, 2013
Transformational Leadership Behavior Enhances Employee Performance
Research by Dr. Adam Grant helps to highlight how
transformational leadership can transcend people’s self-interest. The leader is
seen as the enhancer of performance to create the reality of performance. His work focuses on understanding how transformational leadership's influence is enhanced
with follower contact and how pro-social perceptions mediate this performance. Organizational leaders should understand how their behavior enhances that of followers to achieve higher level outcomes.
The fundamental responsibility is
for all leaders to motivate their followers to achieve new heights (Vroom &
Jago, 2007). Without motivation there cannot be action. The transformational
leader can elicit inspiration to rally motivated effort around a vision.
Effectiveness comes through the ability to motivate the most followers as
possible to do and be more in the process of change.
Transformational leaders have certain
behaviors that impact their ability to be successful. They can articulate a
vision, emphasize collective identities, express confidence and optimism, rely
on core values, and push for ideals (House, 1977). Such leaders understand that
people must see the future, should work together, can get through the change, and
focus on their essential value systems while trying to improve the environment.
It is a process of adjusting behaviors and the environment for a more
productive end.
Influence requires the ability to
change reality. Ultimately, creating structural changes in worker’s jobs create
and impact on performance (Piccolo, et. al, 2010). When employees can make a connection between
their goals, paths to performance, desirable rewards, and the vision they can
put their behavior within context. Such behavior and performance creates a
higher level of awareness and this develops group behavior which manifests
itself in new reinforced group expectations.
Transformational leadership takes
on different dimensions. It includes inspirational, idealized influence,
intellectual stimulation and individual consideration (Bass, 1985). Such leaders should learn to inspire,
influence their environment, create intellectual interest and provide
consideration to the needs of their members. Such behaviors help in the
developing and maintaining of a progressive and developing network of
followers.
Dr. Adam Grant (2012) found that
transformational leadership contact with followers improved performance and perceptions
of pro-social mediated this relationship. It furthers the argument that there
is a relationship between leadership, job design and meaning making of
employees. Leaders influence the perceptional boundaries between beneficiaries and
worker actions. It would seem that strong communication skills, leadership
skills, and relating task to performance with end user (i.e. customer) needs
impact the success of that leader. The vision is a way for people to see and
contextualize their individual parts in the whole process.
Bass, B. (1985) Leadership and performance beyond expectations.
New York: Free Press.
Grant, B. (2012). Leading with
meaning: beneficiary contact, prosocial impact, and the performance effects of
transformational leadership. Academy of
Management Journal, 55 (2).
House, R. J. 1977. A 1976 theory
of charismatic leadership. In J. G. Hunt & L. L. Larsen, (Eds.), Leadership: The cutting edge: 189–207.
Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Piccolo, et.al. (2010). The
relationship between ethical leadership and core job characteristics. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31:
259–278.
Vroom, V. H., & Jago, A. G.
2007. The role of the situation in leadership. American Psychologist, 62: 17–24.
Sunday, June 16, 2013
Developing Transformational Leadership and Emotional Intelligence to Create Firm Performance
Leadership is the ability to draw people to higher levels of
personal performance and development. Without the ability to understand other
people it will be difficult to raise their performance to new levels.
Transformational leadership and emotional intelligence can work together to
create stronger organizational performance based upon the ability to understand
oneself and the social group they are working with. The development of
transformational leadership skills along with emotional intelligence is a
worthwhile endeavor for higher levels of personal and group influence.
Organizational leaders with high levels of emotional
intelligence create stronger organizational performance. According to Jandaghi
et. al. (2009), successful organizations contain higher levels of
transformational leadership within their ranks. Understanding how
transformational leadership and emotional intelligence combine to create higher
group performance is important for choosing and developing future company
executives.
Transformational leadership describes a leader’s ability to
connect with employee’s self-identity and project that into visions that enhance
group performance. The trait can be defined as the ability to create mechanisms
wherein leadership and followers work together to develop enhanced levels of
morale and motivation (Bass & Avolio, 1994). This type of leader is uses
clearly defined visions and charismatic approaches to achieve goals.
Emotional intelligence is a significant predictor of
performance success. The concept of emotional intelligence entails the ability
to be self-aware, self-managed, self-motivated, have empathy and utilize social
skills. Research highlights the concept that emotional intelligence and
transformational leadership are associated (Esfahani & Soflu, 2013). It is
through this self-awareness that such leaders can better understand themselves
to better manage their environments.
There is a connection between awareness of oneself and the
awareness of the environment. Transformational leaders and emotionally
intelligent leaders are associated with each other in terms of traits (Mandell & Pherwani,
2003). This means that the traits seem to work with and influence each other to
create stronger leadership approaches. Traits overlap and manifest themselves in
positive group influence.
Does emotional awareness create group awareness? Available
research seems to support the concept that understanding oneself (emotional
intelligence) helps leaders to understand others perceptions of themselves (self-identity/group
identity) to create a dynamic combination of skills that push groups to perform
at higher levels to achieve clearly defined personal and organizational goals.
Such leaders understand that goals that do not have much
meaning for employees are unlikely to be fulfilled. Employees will simply be
dragged along because the work does not conform to their self-identity or the
nature of how they see themselves within their wider social networks.
Transformational leaders understand how these social mechanisms operate in
order to create enhanced levels of financial performance. It is difficult to
understand social structure and its motivating mechanisms unless one has first
conquered their inner emotional understandings of self. To master the self allows the mastery of
groups and in turn enhance financial performance. Social and financial aspects
are associated concepts that rest in the development of group performance. It takes many hands to build something worthwhile.
Bass, B. & Avolio, B. (Eds.) (1994). Improving
organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
Esfahani, N. & Soflu, H. (2013).
Emotional intelligence and transformational leadership in physical education
managers. Cypriot Journal of Educational
Sciences, 8 (1).
Jandaghi, G. et. al. (2009). Comparing transformational
leadership in successful and unsuccessful companies. International Journal of Social Sciences, 4 (3).
Mandell, B. & Pherwani, S. (2003). Relationship between
emotional intelligence and transformational leadership style: a gender comparison.
Journal of Business & Psychology, 17
(3).
Monday, April 15, 2013
Communication Abilities of Leaders in the Virtual World
According to Hoyt and Blascovich (2003)
transformational leadership has a significant impact on online groups. The same
leadership methodology in real life applies in the virtual world as the same
basic mechanics apply. Such leaders are able to encourage new ways of thinking,
are able to adjust their leadership style to the situation, and can help people
imagine a vision.
No amount of communication ability can change the
fundamentals of leadership. However, there does appear to be a natural
connection between the transformational style and the virtual world. Such
leaders are charismatic, arouse enthusiasm, loyalty, and trust (Schermerhorn,
2002). People sense their style even in the virtual world as pieces and bits of
it make their way across the airwaves.
Such leadership can be seen as the following
(Avolio, Bass, & Jung (1999):
- 1.) Idealized Influence-role models
- 2.) Inspirational Motivation-Give meaning to others.
- 3.) Intellectual Stimulation-Be creative and question old beliefs.
- 4.) Individualized Consideration-Concerned with individual needs.
Virtual communication is an enhancement to previous
methods of communication. The differences lay in the amount of information a
person may receive over the virtual airways versus in person. Such interactive
technology is a major boost over the one way communication abilities of the
television. People can now respond, vote, tweet, text and use other methods of
furthering the network of the messages giving greater influence to the leader.
The nature of communication and the focus of the
messaging are very important in creating effective group leadership. A study of
teenagers using virtual communication found that those who referred to the
group goals above themselves had a greater following (Cassell, Huffaker,
Tversky, & Ferriman, 2006). This helps highlight the concept that effective
leadership is more about “what” versus “who”. “What” is the message and
solution while “who” is the communicative ability of the individual.
Chanel-Expansion Theory describes how
leaders ability to connect with followers in ever expanding new ways that
develop new methods of communicating. The messages in virtual communication create
implicit coding that is picked up by followers once they have developed appropriate cognitive
schemas of the speaker (Carlisle & Phillips, 1984). In other words, once
the follower understands the communication style of the leader and begins to
follow their messages they can tune into implicit messaging.
A study conducted by Salter, et. al. (2010) tested
the influence of follower personality on the assessment of the leader in a
virtual classroom. In the study 306 participants filled out two surveys
providing for 612 total responses. The first survey assessed viewer impression
of a leader (Leader 1) who used transformational language while the second survey assessed
viewer impression of a leader (Leader 2) who used less transformational language.
Results:
-Viewers depicted Leader 1 to be more
transformational than Leader 2.
-There were slight differences between males and
females in the assessment.
-Females found language to be less passive and more charged.
-Those with conscientious personalities may find
additional transformational messages than those who were not.
Analysis for Virtual Communication:
The language used within organizations impacts the
perceptions of employees. Certain types of employees will be attracted to different types of leadership styles. Once employees have some familiarity with
the style of a leader they will begin to pick up on subtle cues and language
uses in order to determine additional meaning. Women and sensitive types pick
up on language cues much more easily and readily than many males or
non-sensitive types. This may be one reason why women are more turned off by
certain kinds of messages when compared to males. Virtual organizations and
marketing experts should be aware of the type of language they are using so as
to either improve organizational efficiency through proper communication or
attract the right customers to their organization. Virtual professors should be
aware of their language use so as to not thwart engagement and motivation with
students.
Avolio, B. J., Bass, B. M., &
Jung, D. I. (1999). Re-examining the components of transformational and
transactional leadership using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Journal
of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72(4), 441–462.
Carlisle & Phillips, D.
(1984). The effects of enthusiasm training on selected teacher and student
behaviors in pre-service physical education teachers. Journal of Teaching in
Physical Education, 4(1), 164–175.
Cassell, J., Huffaker, D.,
Tversky, D., & Ferriman, K. (2006). The language of online leadership:
Gender and youth engagement on the Internet. Developmental Psychology, 42(3),
436–449.
Hoyt, C. (2003). Transformational and transactional leadership
in virtual and physical environments. Small Group Research, 34 (6).
Salter, C., Green, M., Duncan, P. Berre, A. &
Torti, C. (2010). Journal of Leadership
Studies, 4 (2).
Schermerhorn, J. (2002). Management. Hoboken,
NJ: Wiley.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)