"The way we see things is affected by what we know or what we believe"- John Berger. The book is one of the greats for understanding art and how perception makes all the difference in our lives. In any painting there are the perceptions of the painter and the perceptions of the audience. Each person sees something a little different from the painting based upon how they perceive the world around them. The concepts in his book have broader implications.
We know this through this experience but his book helps highlight this for the artistic crowd. Most of us have experienced two people seeing the same thing but interpreting what they are seeing differently. This can lead to all types of arguments and discussions on whose interpretation of the version is real.
To us our perceptions are real. What we see is real and what we feel is real. Despite this belief it is not necessarily true. Most of us have a single way of seeing the world and simply can't comprehend the ways others view the world. Entire cultures are in the delusion of their perception which leads to conflict.
In the book he looks at a number of different paintings and shows how the artists perception is built within the painting. Each painting has a hint to the nature of the author much like each of our actions gives a hint to us. Paying close attention to the objects, styles and colors in the painting will help you see a glimpse of who the author really is and how he/she views the world.
This is why we must sometimes close our eyes and see the world beyond the obvious. Take a look at the pieces, parts, and manners of a people and you will start to see how they view the world. Berger's specifically uses the concept that "men act-women appear". Men seek to gain and possess and women simply exist in relation to themselves. One is projecting outward and the other projecting inward.
The book has implications beyond art and sexual relations. The gazes he talks about can also be seen as the way we engage in selective attention. We see what we want to see in the world around us. We have been programmed in our lives to pay attention to certain cues from our environment and we are blind to the other cues and interpretations of the world. The scariest part of human nature is that we often misinterpret and try and force that misinterpretation on others.
The blog discusses current affairs and development of national economic and social health through unique idea generation. Consider the blog a type of thought experiment where ideas are generated to be pondered but should never be considered definitive as a final conclusion. It is just a pathway to understanding and one may equally reject as accept ideas as theoretical dribble. New perspectives, new opportunities, for a new generation. “The price of freedom is eternal vigilance.”—Thomas Jefferson
Showing posts with label perception. Show all posts
Showing posts with label perception. Show all posts
Saturday, February 28, 2015
Sunday, June 29, 2014
Learning About Perception, Creativity, and Science Through Poetry
Few
things strike as true as poetry from great artists who pondered the nature of
man and the universe. Some poetry is long and some is short but each brings a
different perspective about this thing we call existence. The poetry below is
about our imaginations and the power of seeing and perceiving the world. Those
who feel and see the world do so through their mental faculties built upon the
information gathered through their senses.
This
knowledge is not reliant only on physical sensation but the interpretation of
that sensation. Those with higher cognitive functions adapt, innovate and
perceive at a higher level than those who don’t. They make more connections, understand in
greater depth, and can see the impact of decisions from the power of their
imaginations.
Consider
asking a person with no knowledge on a particular subject to formulate a
relevant opinion. Without doubt the far majority will rehash the opinions of
other notable people in society. They
may draw from famous thinkers, politicians, or leading figures in an effort to appear
knowledgeable. However, those who use
their imagination create something new and truer than simple blind copy.
Imagination
is most useful when matched with analytical thinking. We must first make a
connection to a concept and then logically and sequentially analyze the truth
or falsehood of that new concept. When we do this well we create something
called “truth”. It is a truth based upon
new understandings that are supported by fact that create innovative
breakthroughs in science and life.
Consider
a poem by the British Poet William Wordsworth:
''Imagination,
which in truth
Is but another name for absolute power
And clearest insight, amplitude of mind,
And reason, in her most exalted mood.''
Is but another name for absolute power
And clearest insight, amplitude of mind,
And reason, in her most exalted mood.''
The poem discusses perception and
the power that comes from understanding. Perception, or “awareness”, mixed with
the ability to create a model of an event is based in truth to the perceiver.
That model is then tested through thought, experimentation, or experience to
develop clear insight for others. Knowledge, perception, imagination, and
scientific analysis create ways to innovate. Truth in society is built from generations
of people who push forward new truths.
Monday, April 7, 2014
Constructing Knowledge Through Experience-A Teaching Method
Constructivism is a concept that entails all
learning as a building process that creates knowledge through mental processes derived
from the social and communicative process. When students are reflective they
are able to learn from their experience and apply new information to these
concepts. A paper by Abdulla Al Mahmud moves into the concept of learning
through a constructivist perspective by fostering knowledge building through
experience to create better student learning (2013).
In a constructionists perspective
all learning comes from experiencing the world and reflecting on those
experiences. The concept was mention by
John Dewey in his 1910 book How We Think, “Only by wrestling with the
conditions of the problem at hand, seeking and finding his own solution [not in
isolation but in correspondence with the teacher and other pupils] does one
learn.” People live within a social environment and use their experiences and
the knowledge of others to learn.
To understand a person you must
understand what they know and how they know it. Jean Piaget (1985) believed
that knowledge is the result of accurate internalization of information and
reconstructing that information into cognitive meaning. People must take in
information, reflect on it, and build better models of the world to engage
in the process of learning. Teachers must find ways of relaying information to
fit within existing student models.
Social constructivism occurs when
people learn from each other to create sociably acceptable models of
understanding. They use language and their social networks to construct the
meaning of their environment. Most individuals experience and negotiate that
experience with others to create an understanding that is shared among a group
of individuals. That does not mean that the experience or its socially
constructed definition is accurate but only that it is shared.
The best learning occurs when reflection is
part of the process. Critical thinking requires reflection of past and current
situations to develop stronger ways of viewing the world. This can take the
effective of reflection-in-action or reflection-on-action. Both methods offer
some advantages to the development of knowledge.
Reflection-in-action occurs
during a situation when an individual adjusts and moves to events as they occur.
“The
competent practitioner learns to think on his/her feet and is able to improvise
as
s/he
takes in new information and/or encounters the unexpected .”(Pickett,
1996,p. 1). They use past knowledge and current information to build stronger
models as the events unfold.
Reflection-on-action occurs when
a person looks back at past performance or situations and learns new
knowledge. Students may take case scenarios and match then to their models to
expand those understandings. They may review and reflect on their actions to
determine if these actions were successful or unsuccessful. Reflection creates
opportunities to do things better in the future.
Eight factors can be derived from
constructionist pedagogy (Brooks & Brooks, 1993):
1. Learning should take place in
real-world situations.
2. Learning should involve social
negotiation.
3. Content and skills should be
relevant to the student
4. Content and skills should fit
within the student’s previous knowledge
5. Assessments should be
formative
6. Students should be
self-regulatory, self-mediated, and self-aware
7. Teachers are guides
8. Teachers should encourage
multiple perspectives and representations of issues.
The author leaves the reader with
three concepts learned in his analysis. Each of these concepts can be applied
within the constructionist learning method. Students should come with Open-mindedness, Sincerity, and Responsibility. Open-mindedness analyzes multiple
perspectives and possibilities. Sincerity allows for self-reflection on themselves,
their work, and structures. Responsibility will lead to greater concerns of
seeking out the truth in order to solve problems and extract information to
create new learning for others.
Al
Mahmud, A. (2013). Constructivism and reflectivism as the logical counterparts
in TESOL: learning theory versus teaching methodology. TEFLIN Journal: A Publication on the Teaching & Learning of
English, 24 (2).
Brooks, J. & Brooks, M.
(1993). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria:
Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Piaget, J. (1985). The
equilibration of cognitive structures: The central problem of intellectual
development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Pickett,
A. (1996). Reflective teaching practices and academic skills instruction. Retrieved from http://www.indiana.edu/1506/mod02/pickett.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)