One thing I have been encouraging in my research is localized energy independence that is still connected and both a supporter and recipient of support by a larger regional system. In places like Escanaba, there is a discussion on whether or not solar panel farms should be allowed [Home based smaller systems and smaller farms have not yet been explored.] . To me, the discussion is not truly a political one but a practical one on cost, the health of the rest of the grid, risk of dangerous electric outages/blackouts, etc.
Places like Escanaba have a chance to become capable of electric and water independence while attracting people that may want to invest in smaller rural towns less prone to the harsh effects of climate change [One can certainly reject that option in lieu of other well thought out options. The key is well thought out and not political.]
The other question that arises is that when populations decline it means that there are less monies to pay for such infrastructure which could mean more problems in maintenance and outages. Is it possible for smaller towns to insulate themselves from those infrastructure issues?
[Kind of as a side note. I talked to a friend the other day and because of the growing climate issues and shutting off of electricity in some places during cold weather it may be wise to have a week's worth of energy on reserve for heat, cooking, showering, etc. A generator, back up kerosene/propane heaters, more wood for the fireplace on hand, so on and so forth. In the U.P. it gets freezing! I was going to look on FB and have some logs delivered for the firepit and fireplace. I do this as a matter of course for pleasure, but should have some extra on hand for emergencies.]
No comments:
Post a Comment