For example, let us say we have opportunities to update a system to ensure it functions at its highest state. We fail to do that because of political or personal reasons and/or general unwillingness to update when updating would better fulfill the mission. The lower order may in the short run supersede the long term needs.
Some may not have a problem with it and some may find it highly inappropriate to not adjust toward the mission due to reasons not professed. This is often based in the awareness of how or why such systems may move away from their central purpose and the eventual issues of systemically allowing a lower functioning system to persist.
I have always been a little confused why what is morally unacceptable to some could be more than acceptable and even encouraged by others. While searching up moral sentiments and human development I came across an article that discusses gifted development and societal development. "'The Moral Sensitivity of Gifted Children and the Evolution of Society'
No comments:
Post a Comment