The assignation of Japan's Shinzo Abe opens up lots of questions. As a supporter of free nations I am concerned about these actions.
I recognize no person is perfect and when your leader as such your going to have lots of friends and enemies; comes with territory. However, once someone leaves a position it would seem like unruly aggression.
The questions are many. The homemade difficult to trace gun (I think I read that) and the public execution would indicate its political warning. I'm curious what the investigation comes up with. Local, personal or international issue?
What I can say is such behaviors, If supported, opens up a difficult situation and would further indicate nations should hold closely to certain values and norms.
It can be difficult for people to have values. I have seen the best of the best and the worst of the worst. We have given lots of passes to inappropriate behaviors. There should be standards.
Thus far it appears as a mental health issue and personal grudge. HERE. Even in Japan mental health helps in thwarting hate. Now if we could encourage mandatory mental health and accountability to those who intentionally lie, coordinate hate, show serious aggression, steal and benefit from it, lack of remorse among hate initiators and their blind supporters, possibly traumatize of child, or who use legitimate authority in illegitimate ways (social network corruption in policing) we would have taken a step closer to a proactive society with moral conscious as applied to law. Empathy and hardness mixed into a reasonable and rational approach.
No comments:
Post a Comment