Online education and
geographically dispersed students afford new opportunities to gain greater
international business knowledge and support a global business culture. The
advent of high speed virtual communications has changed the rate of global
integration of business culture and opportunities to conduct economic
transactions across thousands of miles. This new mobility of ideas and marketplace
transactions requires relevant forms of education that can support students in
developing a larger mental framework that foster higher levels of global
competitiveness. Research by Erez, et. al. (2013) studied virtually and
globally diverse learning teams and how these impact the development of a
global mindset.
The global conception often
requires at least two different skills that afford a broader perspective of
decisions and ideas. Both cultural intelligence and global identity are
necessary to construct a better understanding of the world and the issues it
faces. The approach to learning allows for constructionist development, or
experiential learning, that affords students the ability to develop personal
experiences, reflection, readjustment and enabling them to compete on a global
scale (Kayes, 2002).
Cultural intelligence entails the
ability to effectively function in culturally diverse settings (Ang & Van
Dyne, 2008). The ability to understand different cultures requires experience
with them and a general understanding of their internal structures and values.
Culture is often subtle and takes on different cues and mannerisms. It takes considerable
time to interact with different cultures and create a better understanding of
them.
Global identity can be defined as
a sense of belonging to and identifying with a global culture (Shokef &
Erez, 2006). Through understanding different cultures it is possible to
understand the similarities that these cultures entail. Many of these
similarities revolve around the essential mannerisms of existence each culture
uses to support itself and survive in the wider world. A global identity is based in identifying with
the similarities of multiple cultures.
The researchers found that
cultural intelligence and global identity increased during the classes.
Students were better able to formulate accurate opinions and interactions with
those in different geographically dispersed locations. They didn’t lose their
local culture or identity but expanded that identity to include a wider
framework of knowledge that helped them reason better on a global scale. The
essential element of virtual learning teams being the formation of trust among members
who sought shared outcomes (i.e. learning). Focusing on similarities among
different cultures was more beneficial than focusing on what makes each culture
unique. The study was a success for online global management programs that
sought to create greater international competitiveness in preparedness.
Ang, S., & Van Dyne, L. (2008).
Conceptualization of cultural intelligence: Definition, distinctiveness, and
nomological network. In S. Ang & L. Van Dyne (Eds.), Handbook of cultural intelligence: Theory,
measurement, and applications: 3–15. New York: M. E. Sharpe.
Erez, M., et. al. (2013). Going
Global: Developing Management Students’ Cultural Intelligence and Global Identity in Culturally
Diverse Virtual Teams. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 12
(3).
Kayes, D. C. (2002). Experiential
learning and its critics: Preserving the role of experience in management
education. Academy of Management
Learning and Education, 1: 137–149.
Shokef, E., & Erez, M. (2006).
Global work culture and global identity as a platform for a shared
understanding in multicultural teams. In B. Mannix, M. Neale and Y. Chen (Eds.)
National culture and groups.
Research on Managing Groups and Teams, vol. 9: 325–352.
No comments:
Post a Comment