Faculty have many responsibilities
that include teaching, volunteer work, and research. A paper by Dan Worrell
(2009), talks about the differences between teaching and research in
universities. He indicates that research universities have an advantage in the
market but may not be focused on the more important aspects of teaching. The
focus is based primarily in the way schools are ranked by outside
organizations but this may not be the best use of professor's time.
According to the authors, U.S. News
and World Report, BusinessWeek, and the Wall Street Journal often rank schools
based upon their research capabilities. This creates emphasis to engage
professors in research to move their rankings upward. These rankings naturally
have influence on student choice and other financial benefits.
As professors engage more in
research they have reduced teaching loads and higher levels of autonomy. Their
research activities are often rewarded within universities with higher salaries
and greater prestige. The more times a university is published the higher its
overall ranking in the public. When research is significant the research reaps
additional benefits but does cost students.
There are two issues that should be
considered. These issues include teaching
as an important track to faculty development and research that is considered
most important to society. Teaching should be the primary goal of the
university with research being an augmentation to that teaching to further the
body of knowledge in a particular subject area.
The author further moves on to
discuss the concept that a considerable percentage of research is not focused
on what matters to society. Some of research should lean toward societal
problems and the potential solutions to those problems. Research should be
practical and applied in nature to help the greatest amount of people.
There is a balance to be played
between research and teaching. It would seem that all teachers should be
engaged in some level of research but should not forget the primary goal of
widening student’s perspectives. This is likely the most difficult aspect of
managing a university through the varying political and economic pressures they
face. Teaching and scholarship go together but should do so at appropriate
levels. Teaching tracks should be rewarded as an important alternative to research.
Worrell, D. (2009). Assessing
business scholarship: the difficulties in moving beyond the rigor-relevance
paradigm trap. Academy of Management
Learning & Education, 8 (1).
No comments:
Post a Comment