Casa del Mar |
Job embeddedness is a concept
that refers to, “the combined forces that keep a person from leaving his or her
job” (Yao et. al, 2004,pp. 159). This concept can include compensation,
organizational fit, personal abilities, management style, etc… The concept is
closely associated with employee satisfaction in terms of how and what
employees feel about the organization.
Turnover rates and poor
performance can be expensive for organizations. In many low skilled positions
turnover rates can be excessive costing both time and money for recruiting and
training. Higher absenteeism, resistant behavior, and poor customer relations
can take a toll on a company’s profit margins. Understanding and improving upon
job embeddedness will also improve upon the human relations and performance
within the organization.
Job embeddedness theory indicates
that when there are strong links and proper organization fit between employees
and organizations, employees will be more motivated to display strong
performance (Lee, et. al, 2004). This performance has a whole range of
important improvements for organizations. Consider a few of the following:
-Stronger service and service
recovery.
-Lower turnover rates and
improvement costs.
-Less resistant behavior.
-Higher human efficiency and
performance.
-Higher customer return rates and
impression.
As you look through the list
above you might be able to figure that each of the costs are associated with
poor employee embeddedness. When customers have a poor impression of the
organization they are not likely to return and this can limit present and
future sales. Resistant behavior and poor performance can cause mistakes within
the workplace and an inability to improve upon operations as employees avoid
change and direction. As organizations are socio-economic groups these concepts
are central to a well-run business.
According to a study conducted by
Karatepel and Karadas (2012) job embeddedness has a huge factor on
organizational success. They collected sample data from 7 hotels ranked in the
four and five star resort area of Poiana Brasov region of Romania. All
participants were direct front-line workers hired as desk agents, food servers,
door attendance, guest representatives, bell attendants and bar tenders.
-Training, empowerment, and
rewards enhance front-line employee job embeddedness.
-Association of empowerment and
service recovery.
-No association between training
and service recovery.
-Training and empowerment
increase extra-role behavior.
-No association of rewards and
extra-role behavior.
-Job embeddedness as a concept
increase service performance.
Analysis:
The concept of job embeddedness
entails the perception of employees and their positions within the
organization. The study has encouraged a better understanding of how training,
empowerment, and rewards can improve upon this perception and increase overall
performance. Since training was not associated with service recovery while
empowerment was associated employees should feel free to find unique ways to
meet customer needs. This would be difficult if were not allowed to go outside necessary
procedures when necessary. Furthermore, since training and empowerment also
increased extra-role behaviors of employees it would be a beneficial focus of
management leaders. Together the concepts of training, rewards, and empowerment
enhance embeddedness which has a tangible result on extra-role behavior and overall
service recovery.
Lee, T. , Mitchell, T.,
Sablynski, C., Burton, J.& Holtom,
B.(2004). The effects of job embeddedness on organizational citizenship, job
performance, volitional absences, and voluntary turnover, Academy of
Management Journal 47(5): 711–722.
Yao, X., Lee, T., Mitchell, T.&
Burton, J. & Sablynski, C. (2004). Job embeddedness:
current research and future
directions, in Griffeth, R.; Hom, P. (Eds.). Understanding Employee
Retention and
Turnover. Greenwich,
CT: Information Age, 153–187.
Karatepel, O. & Karadas, G.
(2012). The effect of management commitment to service quality on job
embeddedness and performance outcomes. Journal
of Business Economics and Management, 13 (4).
No comments:
Post a Comment